class-header-css3Welcome to my blog where I re-post interesting legal news and share a few of my own opinions on some stuff as well.
class-header-offline
Know of an Awesome Lawyer? If you know of an awesome attorney who goes above and beyond that you think deserves some recognition, let me know about them and what makes them so unique and I may just add them to my "AMAZING ATTORNEYS" category in this blog.
class-header-css3
You will find links to FREE resources for child custody and support, as well as information on Parental Alienation and how to fight it.
class-header-css3
Welcome to my blog where I re-post interesting legal news and share a few of my own opinions on some stuff as well.
class-header-semantics
This Blog Endorses Never Get Busted: Arrested for a drug crime? Have a loved one in prison? NGB is famous for freeing prisoners and defendants. NGB does many pro bono (free) cases and some cases charge as little as $500. They work with each client’s budget.
class-header-offline
Know of an Awesome Lawyer? If you know of an awesome attorney who goes above and beyond that you think deserves some recognition, let me know about them and what makes them so unique and I may just add them to my "AMAZING ATTORNEYS" category in this blog.
class-header-css3
You will find links to FREE resources for child custody and support, as well as information on Parental Alienation and how to fight it.
class-header-css3
Welcome to my blog where I re-post interesting legal news and share a few of my own opinions on some stuff as well.

e1





Hover effect 4v2


Apprentice Info




Hover effect 4v2


Custody Resources




Hover effect 4v2


Pro Se Resources


Showing posts with label Amazing Attorneys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amazing Attorneys. Show all posts

Friday, September 2, 2016

Awesome Attorney Patrick J McCarthy

So two people just told me about attorney Patrick J McCarthy, and how great of a lawyer he is. I went on yelp and these were some of the stellar reviews:

"After having a shitty lawyer who would MISS COURT APPEARANCES because "he didn't know" or would send in his daughters for him, i let that shitty lawyer (who i will review next!) keep the $2000 we gave him to do NOTHING and got a new one.  Patrick McCarthy was actually recommended to me by my parent's lawyer for a mess i got myself into in 2006.  i was about to graduate from high school&found myself changing into an orange jumpsuit, it was terrible!  well i eventually got bailed out, etc. and met Patrick.  he is a very welcome, straight-forward guy.  his office is also right across the street from the courthouse and he has his own parking in the back which is very convenient.  saves $ and time.  he also said i could park back there when i had court appearances.  one important thing that everyone should know is- TELL YOUR LAWYER THE TRUTH so they can better deal with your situation.  Patrick never tried to sugarcoat anything, just told me the things i needed to get done to get a better deal.  another thing that i think is important after going to court so often is APPEARANCE.  while other lawyers look sloppy, unrested and seem to put no effort into anything, Patrick will always come into court with a presence, looking neat and ready to fight for you.  he answers his phone calls promptly which is important because if you're going to court, you want to know what's going on!  he also represented my boyfriend and would even go down to elk grove to talk to him.  soon, we got the case settled and now i recommend him to everyone.
but wait... not done yet!  living the crazy lifestyle i live (har, har), i also got myself into another mess in early 2008.  he let me know what i needed to do&told me there was no point in paying him for something i could do myself.  he even took the steps to set up interviews with the DA for me free of charge.  there's a sign in his office that says "honest lawyer" and i think that really does explain him.  overall, he is wonderful guy, an aggressive lawyer and i think anyone who becomes his client will be extremely satisfied with his work.
i think i might name my son after him! hahahahaha"


"Wow, I can't believe I wrote that review over 6 years ago!  A lot has changed since I first created my Yelp but everything that I wrote about Patrick hasn't.
I finally decided to get my misdemeanor expunged last year & even though I've been working in an office for 7 years, assembling the paperwork was still kind of confusing.  Since I had used Patrick, I phoned the office & the wonderful legal assistant said I could come down, drop off my paperwork & she would look it over.  I did just that & she let me know the things I was missing.  My record is finally clean & god forbid I need anything else in the future from him, but if I do- I know who I'll go to! :)


PS- If you are putting off getting your record expunged, please don't!  After the paperwork is in, it only takes about 2 months until it's gone."


"Charged with a felony boating under The influence. McCarthy was honest and professional but most of all he won and got the charges dismissed. How does it get better!"



"Pat is a terrific lawyer.  He is smart, kind and very well respected in the legal community, (easy to see in the courtroom setting)  He saved a friend from going to jail and also got him a program. instead of just punishment like the DA wanted.  Save yourself a lot of grief by phoning Pat first.  He will do a wonderful job for you unlike some lawyers and you needn't worry about his ethics.  He wants justice not just whats convenient.  He is a Super Man lawyer.... this is my first review, because he deserves it."

Address: 901 H St #304, Sacramento, CA 95814

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Public Defenders who have won acquittals in homicide cases


Jason Arreaga gripped Holmquist's hand as hard as he could as a clerk read his verdict on Feb. 23. Arreaga had been accused of a 2014 double murder in Fieldbrook, and had spent almost a year and a half in the Humboldt County jail. A trial in September 2015 had ended in a hung jury, and the 30-year-old was facing life in prison without the possibility of parole.
As the verdicts were read, "Not guilty of second degree murder, not guilty of voluntary manslaughter," Arreaga became emotional, Holmquist said. She did, too. He would end up staying in jail several more weeks on an unrelated charge, but Arreaga had beenacquitted.
Holmquist said the jury's finding speaks for itself. During the trial, she focused on the Sheriff's Office investigation, saying deputies had quickly identified Arreaga as the suspect and "never looked seriously at anyone else." Holmquist convinced the jury there wasn't enough evidence to convict Arreaga, who's now back in his Lake County home.
Holmquist said Arreaga wasn't your typical client accused of double murder. He was polite and patient, she said, despite the mistrial and being far from his family.
"I remember being upfront with him from the beginning," she said, telling him that going to trial in a year would be fast. "Because as much as a person wants their trial as soon as possible — because they want to get out — we can't do that. We can't just go to trial immediately. We have to do what we need to do."
Holmquist said Arreaga was always patient with her, but it didn't mean she could drag her feet. "Sometimes you have to think, 'OK this person is locked in a cell 23 hours a day,' and you have to put that in perspective when you're working on it. It's hard, when someone is in that mindset of, 'I didn't do it so I shouldn't be here,' to explain to them that 'the police think that you did it. And the district attorney thinks that you did it. And now we have to overcome that and it takes some time.'"
Public defenders play against a stacked deck. When it comes to trials, Holmquist said, "theoretically the defense should always lose because ... [prosecutors] get to choose their cases. They choose the ones they believe have enough evidence to show beyond a reasonable doubt that it happened."
At any point, a district attorney's office can choose to dismiss charges. "I don't get to do the same thing," Holmquist said. "I take the case no matter what the circumstances are."
And Holmquist's success is remarkable. In six years she's successfully defended two homicide cases and seen another dismissed. State statistics on murder convictions were unavailable, but data show that out of 300,000 felony arrests in 2014, 80 percent were resolved in court. Only 0.1 percent of the total resulted in acquittal.



A San Francisco jury acquitted a 26-year-old Oakland man of murder charges Thursday in a 2007 slaying outside a Metreon nightclub after the defense argued that the case was marred by flawed testimony and urine-tainted evidence.
Kenoye Stroman was charged with the Sept. 16, 2007, shooting death of 27-year-old Ronald Jacques outside Jillian's - a slaying that prosecutors said was a result of drunken mayhem over an inappropriate advance on a woman.
Stroman was arrested after the attack when a police officer spotted and followed a distinctive limousine, decked out in racing stripes, that sped away from the 1:44 a.m. shooting.
Police recovered the weapon hidden in the limo and tested the seven passengers for gunshot residue. Stroman and another passenger both showed traces of gunfire on their hands, and prosecutors offered the other passenger immunity to testify against Stroman.
Prosecutor Harry Dorfman told jurors someone opened fire from the limo during a brawl that began after Stroman's cousin grabbed the buttocks of Jacques' sister-in-law.



San Francisco, CA — A man falsely accused of causing the death of an elderly newspaper vendor has been acquitted, while a fast food customer tackled by police after being mistaken for a drug dealer has also been cleared of charges, San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi announced today.
Both verdicts were read within moments of each other late Monday in the unrelated cases.
Jurors deliberated 45 minutes before finding Mark Cassell, 39, not guilty of involuntary manslaughter, elder abuse and assault likely to cause great bodily injury. If convicted, he faced up to 11 years in state prison, said his attorney, Deputy Public Defender Azita Ghafourpour.
In an unprovoked attack on Jan. 28, 2013, a man picked up 77-year-old Dallas Ayers as he sold newspapers outside One Post Street, then either dropped him or fell to the ground with him. Ayers died a month later in the hospital from complications from a broken hip.
A witness snapped a blurry photo of the attacker, which police distributed in a crime bulletin. Cassell was arrested March 13, 2013 after an officer concluded he resembled the photo.
“Like the suspect, Mr. Cassell is a Caucasian man with a beard—but that is where the resemblance ends,” Ghafourpour said. “He was an easy target because he was homeless and had mental health issues. He was swept off the street and charged with a serious crime.”
Four witnesses saw the attack on Ayers. None picked Cassell out of a lineup as the attacker, though one identified him in court one year later.
Ayers’ attacker was described as 5 feet 8 inches tall. Cassell stands 6 feet 4 inches.
“It did not take the jury long to realize this was a case of mistaken identity,” Ghafourpour said.
“Mr. Ayer’s death was a tragedy, but his tragic death should not be compounded by the injustice of convicting an innocent man.”
Minutes apart in a different courtroom, jurors acquitted Jacobia Perkins, 28, of resisting arrest using force or violence and resisting arrest causing serious bodily injury, both felonies. Perkins was also acquitted of battery on a police officer, a misdemeanor. If convicted, Perkins faced up to five years behind bars, said his attorney, Deputy Public Defender Douglas Welch.
Perkins was arrested Nov. 26 in an incident that quickly escalated, Welch said.
Perkins was inside a Burger King at 16th and Mission streets when he was approached by San Francisco Police Sgt. Sean Perdomo, who was in plainclothes. Five minutes earlier, Perdomo claimed he had received a tip from a secret informant that someone was selling methamphetamine in the back of the restaurant. The informant provided no physical description, and was gone when Perdomo responded.
Perdomo immediately focused on the African American Perkins, who was sitting at a table looking at his phone. He strode toward Perkins, who quickly stood up. Perdomo slammed him to the table, then took him to the ground, Welch argued. Perdomo testified that Perkins grabbed his phone and made a motion toward his waistband, causing him to believe he had a weapon.
Perkins, who was unarmed and did not have any drugs, suffered facial injuries in the arrest. Officers claimed Perkins’ face was bloodied by slamming his own head against the police vehicle. One officer fractured his pinky finger as numerous officers forced Perkins into a police van, and another officer’s face was grazed by Perkins’ shoe.
At least 15 police officers were involved in Perkins’ arrest, but no video was preserved in the incident and no independent witness statements were taken.
During the trial, Perdomo acknowledged he was admonished after the Office of Citizen Complaints determined he used excessive force against a man in an unrelated 2013 incident.
After deliberating five hours, jurors acquitted Perkins based on the determination that Perdomo had not acted in lawful performance of his duties when he detained and arrested Perkins.
“Mr. Perkins was minding his own business and only wanted to be left alone,” Welch said. “The jury affirmed he had the right to walk away from an illegal arrest.”
Adachi said both cases illustrate the dangers of placing assumptions over evidence and relying solely on unreliable identification.
“Eyewitness misidentification accounts for the overwhelming majority of wrongful convictions. Both Mr. Cassell and Mr. Perkins have been behind bars since their arrests, which were based not on evidence but on bias and a rush to judgment. Thanks to the help of skilled public defenders and thoughtful juries, they are finally free,” Adachi said.





San Francisco, CA — A homeless man who stabbed a bully who had beaten him bloody over a shelter bed was acquitted after a jury determined he acted in self-defense, San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi announced today.
Jurors deliberated less than two hours Tuesday before finding Gregory Ishengoma, 57, not guilty of assault with a deadly weapon causing great bodily injury and battery with serious bodily injury. Ishengoma faced up to seven years in prison if convicted, said his attorney, Deputy Public Defender Kevin Mitchell.
Ishengoma, who worked for 25 years as a merchant seaman before falling into homelessness, was arrested Jan. 8. Earlier that day, Ishengoma made a reservation to spend the night at a homeless shelter inside a Bayview church. Ishengoma arrived early to the shelter, and was the fourth person to check in.
As he settled onto a mat, a fellow homeless man approached him angrily. Though the man had not reserved a space, he claimed Ishengoma was sleeping in his preferred spot. When Ishengoma told the man to find another mat, the man attacked him, pummeling him in the face with his fists until he was bleeding from the nose and mouth. Security escorted both men from the shelter.
The pair began arguing in the street. When Ishengoma walked away, the man followed him. Ishengoma, frightened he would be beaten again, stabbed his attacker once in the abdomen.
Ishengoma cooperated with police, who released him the following day after declining to file charges. The man was transported to the hospital, where he would spend two months due to infection and other complications, resulting in a colostomy bag. When he was released, he was livid that police had not arrested Ishengoma and demanded something be done. Ishengoma was arrested May 8, after the man saw him at a shelter and called police.
During the weeklong trial, the injured man took the stand, testifying that Ishengoma “got his ass whupped” for taking the mat. The man appeared hostile on the stand, admitting he was an angry, short-tempered person who had committed violence against women and men alike.
“The complaining witness made it clear to the jurors that he was not a man who listened to reason,” Mitchell said. “As a result, Mr. Ishengoma had to resort to defending himself with a knife.”
The man also claimed he was at the church for a bible study session, though none of the regular bible study participants could confirm his presence. A witness for the prosecution provided statements that were inconsistent with her initial descriptions to police, and had trouble determining which jurors were male or female due to her poor vision. A police sergeant who took the stand admitted that he never wrote down that the complaining witness was carrying a box cutter in his backpack.
Ishengoma, who had been in jail for three months, was released Tuesday.
“Mr. Ishengoma, too poor to post $200,000 bail, had to pay with three months of his life before experiencing relief when the jury cleared his good name,” Mitchell said.
Adachi also applauded the verdict.
“Defending yourself is a right, not a crime. Mr. Ishengoma had been beaten bloody and followed down the street by his tormentor. He was understandably concerned for his life. Thanks to his public defender, the jury set him free,” Adachi said.



Three men charged in two separate killings in San Francisco in 2007 were acquitted today of murder in San Francisco Superior Court. Emon Brown, 21, Joc Wilson, 23, and Floyd Jackson, 22, were indicted by a criminal grand jury in 2008 on murder and gang charges.A jury found them not guilty of all charges this morning.Prosecutors had charged all three men with the Aug. 2, 2007, murder of 29-year-old Brandon Perkins, of San Francisco, in the 100 block of Loehr Street. Brown and Wilson were also charged with the Sept. 2, 2007, murder of 32-year-old Byron Smith, of San Francisco, in the 100 block of Velasco Avenue.Both murders occurred near the Sunnydale public housing projects.Prosecutors accused the three men of being members of the Down Below Gang in the Sunnydale neighborhood, fighting for territory in the area with the Towerside Gang, to which the victims allegedly belonged.Police said the victims were chased down in broad daylight and gunned down.According to the public defender’s office, which represented Wilson, the prosecution case “relied solely on thin circumstantial evidence.”Deputy Public Defender Steve Olmo argued that Wilson’s DNA being found on the handlebar of a bicycle ridden by one of Smith’s assailants did not prove his client actually participated in the killing.Olmo said some witnesses told conflicting stories or changed their testimony, and that one witness “was emphatic” Wilson was not present during Smith’s killing.The guns used in the killings were never recovered, the public defender’s office said.”My client was not there,” for either shooting, said attorney Tony Tamburello, who represented Brown. Tamburello claimed the one witness to Perkins’ shooting was untruthful, and that he tainted the testimony of a female witness to Smith’s shooting. “She was absolutely not only tainted, but she was unable to see what she claimed to have seen,” Tamburello said. The jury had a difficult job, but “did the right thing,” Tamburello said. “The family of the victims lost everything, but I think they understood that a wrongful conviction wasn’t going to solve their problems easily,” he said.Jackson’s attorney did not immediately return a call for comment this afternoon.”This was always a hard case,” said district attorney’s office spokesman Brian Buckelew. “Witnesses were too scared to come forward, and the defense used that as an opportunity to cobble together arguments for reasonable doubt.””But we will always prosecute difficult cases against murderers and thugs when we believe they are guilty, as we did here,” Buckelew said.


San Francisco, CA — A man charged with murder in a 2012 stabbing in the Bayview District was acquitted of all charges today after a jury determined he acted in self-defense against an attacker who had previously bullied and threatened him, San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi announced.
Jurors deliberated more than three days before finding San Francisco resident Howard Frazier, 47, not guilty of murder, said his attorney, Deputy Public Defender Kleigh Hathaway. Frazier was charged in the Feb. 15, 2012 stabbing of 54-year-old Luther Robinson III at Third Street and Palou Avenue.
Six weeks before the fatal confrontation, Robinson had chased and assaulted Frazier with a club, threatening to kill him. Frazier testified that following the first attack, he learned of Robinson’s string of convictions for violence and became fearful for his life. Frazier testified that he tried to diffuse the conflict by talking to Robinson’s brother, but when the two men ran into each other again, Robinson pursued Frazier.
Frazier, who was considerably smaller than Robinson and was disabled due to back surgery, warned Robinson that he had a knife. When Robinson grabbed Frazier by the vest, Frazier stabbed him once with a pocket knife. Robinson died a short time later at the hospital.
“Mr. Frazier did even more than the law requires in a case of self-defense,” Hathaway said. “When he was assaulted six weeks earlier, he ran. Then, fearing retribution, he requested help from Mr. Robinson’s brother and, finally, he warned Mr. Robinson that he had a knife and only used it as a last resort to protect himself.”
While the conflict between the men ended in tragedy, Mr. Frazier did not commit a crime, Adachi said.
“Mr. Frazier did everything he could to avoid a fight. The evidence presented by Mr. Frazier’s public defender showed he was genuinely afraid he was going to be killed and acted to preserve his own life,” Adachi said.
Frazier, a father of four, is expected to be released Christmas Eve.
The two week trial was heard in front of Judge Harold Kahn. Assistant District Attorney Todd Barrett was the prosecutor in the case.



San Francisco, CA — A man charged with fatally choking a sexual partner during a 2011 encounter in Buena Vista Park was acquitted of murder today, San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi announced.
Jurors deliberated six days before finding David Munoz Diaz, 25, not guilty of murder, said his attorney, Deputy Public Defender Alex Lilien. Diaz was instead convicted of involuntary manslaughter, a charge that carries a maximum penalty of four years. Diaz has been in custody more than three years awaiting trial.
Jurors convicted Diaz of arson of the property of another, mutilating human remains and misdemeanor destroying evidence.
Charges against Diaz stemmed from the death of Freddy Canul-Arguello, 23, whose body was found in Buena Vista Park June 10, 2011. The two men, friendly acquaintances who enjoyed a previous sexual encounter, had hours earlier run into each other in the Castro and walked to the park to have sex. During the tryst, Diaz reluctantly agreed to choke Canul-Arguello, accidentally asphyxiating him. Frightened and distraught, Diaz placed a recycling bin near the body and lit the contents to signal for help. He then pulled a nearby fire alarm box and made several calls to 911.
“David is a sweet kid who never meant to hurt anyone. I am relieved the jury was able to determine the truth—that Freddy’s death was a terrible, tragic accident.” Lilien said.
During the month-long trial, a friend of Canul-Arguello testified that he confided that he enjoyed being choked during sex. Called by the defense, the medical examiner who conducted the autopsy testified that Canul-Arguello’s injuries were not inconsistent with erotic asphyxia. A medical doctor and instructor at UCSF also took the stand, explaining the sexual practice of choking and “breath play.”
Diaz, a restaurant worker, had no previous criminal history.
Adachi applauded the jurors for carefully considering the testimony and weighing the evidence in the case.
“There was no motive for Mr. Diaz to intentionally harm his friend and no evidence to support a murder charge. Fortunately, his public defender was able to show that Mr. Canul-Arguello’s death was a tragedy but not murder as the prosecutor claimed,” Adachi said.

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

Known as the Best CPS Lawyer on the Planet!


Attorney Jennifer Ani was admitted to the State Bar of California in 1993. She is a graduate of McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific, and holds a B.A. in English from University of California at Davis.

Ms. Ani began her career in the private sector working locally for Headlands Mortgage Company. After making a mid-career change in 2006, Ms. Ani focused on the specialized area of Juvenile Dependency, and has focused on the litigation of child abuse matters (CPS cases), working with parents to regain custody of children placed in foster homes, and child custody matters (Family Law).

Jennifer Ani’s law practice includes Juvenile Dependency and Family Law litigation as well as guardianship, adoption, civil rights, juvenile immigration status, marital agreements and dissolution (divorce) mediation, VAWA self-petitions, domestic violence, defense of CPS and child abuse allegations, and legal malpractice.

Ms. Ani continues to give back to the non-profit organizations that gave her experience and training that made possible the mid-career change to the practice of Family and Juvenile Law. Ms. Ani provided pro bono services through the Family Law Project of The Bar Association of San Francisco, and, in addition to receiving their highest award in 2009, the James P. Preovolos Award, she has received their “Outstanding Contribution to Public Service” awards in 2007, 2008, and 2009. In 2010, Ms. Ani was selected to receive the “Family Law Attorney of the Year” award from the Legal Aid Society of California. She is also a recipient of the Wiley P. Manuel award from the State Bar of California.

Attorney Jennifer Ani is a zealous advocate for her clients rights. While she excels as a litigator and is “at home” in any courtroom, if appropriate to your case, she will recommend that you employ mediation and negotiation to save you time, money, and unnecessary drama and expense.

The Law Office of Jennifer Ani provides reasonably priced, competent, and when appropriate, aggressive legal services. Jennifer Ani offers a free initial consultation for your Family Law, Divorce, or Juvenile Dependency matter.

Want current client reviews? Go to avvo.com and see what other clients have said about San Rafael Family Law and Child Custody attorney Jennifer Ani.

Contact Jennifer Ani Here

Friday, May 27, 2016

GERRY SPENCE “WIN YOUR CASE”


One of the better books Gerry Spence has written was his book Win Your Case. His advise is on target. 

Here are a few points he makes in the book.
  • Avoid sarcasm, scorn, and ridicule. Use humor cautiously. Hold back insult. No one admires the cynic, the scoffer, the mocker, the small, and the petty. Giving respect to one’s opponent elevates us. Those who insult and slight do so from low places. Remember: Respect is reciprocal. The employment of humor can be the most devastating of all weapons in an argument. Humor is omnipotent when it reveals the truth. But beware: attempting to be funny and failing is one of the most dangerous of all strategies.
  • Logic is power. If logic is on your side, ride it–ride it all the way. If logic is not on your side, if logic leads to an unjust result, it will have no power. As Samuel Butler said, “Logic is like the sword–those who appeal to it shall perish by it.” Logic does not always lead to truth or justice. Logic defeats spontaneity. Logic is often dull and is more comfortable with the dead, for it is often without spirit. Do not give up creativity for logic. However, the creative mind will soon see that creativity is often served by logic.
  • Action and winning are brothers. The worst of head-on attacks is often better than the most sophisticated defense. Never permit your opponent to take control. Do not defend when you can attack. Counter punching is for boxers, and counterpunchers most often lose. The great champions of the world take control. The great generals attack first, and attack again. Take the initiative. Do something. But with those we love, the best attack is often to attack with love, and, as we shall see, winning is often accomplished by the art of losing.
  • Admit at the outset the weak points in your argument. You can expose your weaknesses in a better light than your opponent, who will expose them in the darkest possible way. An honest admission, having come from you, not only endows you with credibility, it also leaves your opponent with nothing to say except what you have already admitted.
  • Understand your power. Give yourself permission–only to win. But remember, arrogance, insolence, and stupidity are close relatives.

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Kathleen Zellner is My New Favorite Person

When Kathleen Zellner was little she had a friend across the street who kept a pet duck. Toothbrush was a peaceful soul who liked to eat wasps and paddle around a backyard kiddie pool in their neighborhood in small-town Bartlesville, Oklahoma, in the late 1950s. Zellner was definitely not a peaceful soul—she ordered martial arts guides out of comic books, then hid them behind the covers off her doll books so she could study judo and jujitsu moves without her mother noticing. Zellner regularly put those punches and kicks to practical use. One day, a mean teenage boy grabbed Toothbrush and threw him to hunting dogs penned in a neighbor’s yard. Zellner, about 8 at the time, was furious. “Kathleen was so mad she went over and beat him up. She was fierce,” says her brother, John Hall Thomas, a defense attorney in New Orleans, who remembers the boy’s nose bleeding as an adult pulled his sister off the boy. “Nobody messed with Kathleen after that, I’m telling you.”
Zellner says that same feeling of righteous protection still motivates her: “What drives me is the abuse of power—the bullying and the victim. I have such a strong reaction when I see people who can’t defend themselves.”
The wiry girl who meted out street justice over a dead duck grew up to become a defense attorney who has secured the exoneration of 17 men and won almost $90 million from wrongful conviction and medical malpractice lawsuits. Zellner has also dropped a headless lamb into a creek to investigate the rape and murder of a child, coaxed 21 confessions from a serial killer and seen it reported that Jessica Biel would play her in a movie. An attorney said facing her at trial was “worse than my divorce.”
The bullies Zellner will face next, she says, are the Wisconsin police and prosecutors who locked up Steve Avery, who became a national phenomenon with the December release of the Netflix documentary Making a Murderer. The doc, which led a lot of viewers to believe Avery was framed, opens with his wrongful conviction and then 18 years in prison for a 1985 rape in Manitowoc County; it then digs deep into his arrest and conviction for the 2005 murder in the same county of Teresa Halbach, a photographer killed after driving to the Avery family’s auto salvage yard on Halloween to take a picture of a van for Auto Tradermagazine. Avery’s low-IQ nephew Brendan Dassey, 16 at the time, confessed he helped his uncle rape and kill Halbach in what is either the reluctant admission of a horrific crime or an example of persistent detectives leading and prodding a dimwitted teen to agree with the story they want. Dassey was found guilty in a separate trial. Zellner watched the series in her 3,000-square-foot home theater, where she does jury prep and screens her favorite Coen brothers movies. “When I watched the Avery case, I felt that the attitude toward him by the prosecutors and the state was that he was disposable. It was almost like a class thing. [His family] didn’t matter, they had no power,” Zellner says. “The longer I watched it, the more angry I got.”